RAM KISHORE v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO.
/9765/2025 · 2025-11-26
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176481 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176481 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9765 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 162 of 2024, under sections 302, 323 IPC, P.S. Auras, District Unnao.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that informant and his uncle were having their residences adjacent to each other and on 24.6.2024 when uncle was cutting soil a dispute occurred because of which uncle hit father of informant with fawda which resulted in his death. The fawda was also recovered at the instance and pointing out of the applicant. Cause of death as per post mortem report is ante mortem head injuries.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the allegations levelled in the FIR prima facie pre meditated intent to commit the offence is missing, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 24.6.2024 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Ram Kishore be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashok Kumar Singh, Rahul Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Abhishek Mishra, Gaurav Mishra Ram Kishore .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 26, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 9765 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench