RAMGOPAL SON OF KOOMAR SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/2610/2025 · 2025-07-21
Sameer Jain
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17648 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17648 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:27181] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2610/2025 Ramgopal Son Of Koomar Singh, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Mahrawar, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
2. Pankaj Upadhyay Son Of Mataprasad Upadhyay, Aged About 30 Years, Current Address 302-B, Riya Ampayar, Near Nri Circle, Pratap Nagar, Sanganer, Jaipur City (East), Permanent Address Infront Of Panchmukhi Hanuman Temple, Siholi House, Gadarpura, Nihalganj, Dholpur (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajveer Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 21/07/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the present FIR is lodged with a false and concocted story which is it is not a matter of loot but qua recovery proceedings initiated by the petitioner as the loan money given to the person i.e. complainant was refused to be paid back. Factual report which has submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor has also changed the applicability of Section 309, 318 BNS. Heard.
[2025:RJ-JP:27181] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2610/2025] In the facts and circumstances, no coercive action shall be taken qua the petitioner. The appropriate conclusion be drawn by the Investigating Authority after considering the evidences relied upon by the petitioner. Petitioner is directed to appear before Investigating Officer on or before 28.07.2025. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/32