RAJBALI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
/7598/2025 · 2025-11-24
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176467 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176467 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7598 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. This is the second bail application filed on behalf of the applicant. His first bail application has been dismissed as not pressed vide order dated
15.07.2025.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State and perused the record. Whereas, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the informant.
3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.84 of 2025, under Sections 65(2) BNS and Section 5/6 of POCSO Act, P.S.- Cantt., District- Ayodhya.
4. In terms of the FIR, it has been alleged that the daughter of the informant, aged about 6 years, was misbehaved by the applicant, a rickshaw puller. It has further been alleged that the victim refused to undergo medical examination.
5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the fact that the victim has refused to undergo the medical examination and there is no material to suggest the commission of the offence under Section 3/5 of the POCSO Act coupled with the fact that the applicant is in jail since 10.04.2025 having no criminal history, he is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ghulam Mohammad Kamil Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rajbali .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
7. Let the applicant- Rajbali be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which she is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
November 24, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 7598 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench