Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 176445 (MAD)

Agricultural Production Commissioner and v. L Suresh

/220/2025 · 2025-12-12

M Dhandapani

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Rev.Appln.No.220 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 12.12.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI Rev.Appln.No.220 of 2025 1.Agricultural Production Commissioner and Principal Secretary to Govt., Agriculture-Farmers Welfare Department, Fort St.George, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009. 2.The Director of Agriculture, Directorate of Agriculture, Chepauk, Chennai – 5. 3.The District Collector, Tiruvallur Collector Office Complex, Tiruttani Highway, Tiruvallur – 602 001. 4.District Social Welfare Officer/ Enquiry Officer, O/o District Social Welfare, Tiruvallur Collector Office Complex, Tiruttani Highway, Tiruvallur – 602 001. 5.The Local Complaints Committee, Rep. By its Chairperson, Tiruvallur District. ...Review Applicants/Respondents 1 – 5 Vs. 1.L.Suresh … 1st respondent/petitioner 2.M.Tamilazhagi … 2nd respondent/6th respondent 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Rev.Appln.No.220 of 2025 Prayer : Review Application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 of CPC and Section 114 of C.P.C. to review the order dated 18.03.2025 made in W.P.No.20316 of 2024. For Petitioners : Mr.R.U.Dinesh Raj Kumar, Additional Government Pleader For Respondents : Mr.K.V.Sajeev Kumar for M/s.Reshmi Christy ORDER The review petitioners have come up with this Review Application to review the order of this Court dated 18.03.2025 made in W.P.No.20316 of 2024. 2. Learned counsel for the review petitioners would submit that this Court by order dated 18.03.2025 allowed the aforesaid writ petition and imposed a costs of Rs.25,000/- as against the third review petitioner. For removal of cost of Rs.25,000/-, the present review application is filed. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents would fairly submit that the cost may be removed as against the third review petitioner. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Rev.Appln.No.220 of 2025 4. In view of the above, the cost imposed as against the third review petitioner is hereby deleted and the review application is disposed of with the above terms. No costs. 12.12.2025 vm Index : Yes/No Speaking order : Yes/No NCC : Yes/No To: 1.Agricultural Production Commissioner and Principal Secretary to Govt., Agriculture-Farmers Welfare Department, Fort St.George, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009. 2.The Director of Agriculture, Directorate of Agriculture, Chepauk, Chennai – 5. 3.The District Collector, Tiruvallur Collector Office Complex, Tiruttani Highway, Tiruvallur – 602 001. 4.District Social Welfare Officer/ Enquiry Officer, O/o District Social Welfare, Tiruvallur Collector Office Complex, Tiruttani Highway, Tiruvallur – 602 001. 5.The Chairperson, The Local Complaints Committee, Tiruvallur District. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Rev.Appln.No.220 of 2025 M.DHANDAPANI, J. vm Rev.Appln.No.220 of 2025 12.12.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis