Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 176439 (ALL)

AMIT KUMAR and ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. and ANOTHER

A482/5717/2019 · 2025-11-06

Rajeev Bharti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5717 of 2019 Court No. - 23 HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Case called out. 2. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is of the year 2019. 3. None appears on behalf of the applicants to press this application. However, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State is present. 4. It transpires from the order sheet that opportunity was granted to the learned counsel for the applicants to file certified copy of the compromise application filed before the trial court before this Court, but despite the aforesaid order, neither the learned counsel for the applicants is present nor filed any response with regard to compromise deed. 5. Accordingly, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution. 6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. November 6, 2025 Anand/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amrit Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Govt. Advocate (Rajeev Bharti,J.) Amit Kumar And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench