Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 176431 (ALL)

RAJENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. IRREGTION AND WATER RESOURCES DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

/11483/2025 · 2025-11-28

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11483 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned state counsel for opposite party No.1 and Ms. Kamni Singh Advocate holding brief on behalf of Mr. Nishant Shukla learned counsel for opposite parties 2 and 3. 2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authority to consider petitioner's grievance with regard to payment of pension in view of the fact that petitioner has superannuated on 30.9.2019 on the post of Junior Assistant. 3. Since petitioner's grievances would require consideration of factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to make a fresh representation before opposite party No. 2 i.e. Chairman and Administrator, Greator Sharda Sahayak Samdesh, Kshetra Vikash Pradhikari/Pariyojna, Lucknow or any other competent authority. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided within a period of four weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. In case petitioner is found entitled for the aforesaid benefits, actual payment thereof shall be ensured within a period of six weeks thereafter. 4. The petition stands disposed of. November 28, 2025 prabhat Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bhagwati Prasad Nigam, Anurag Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Nishant Shukla (Manish Mathur,J.) Rajendra Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Irregtion And Water Resources Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench