AMITABH SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. SECONDARY EDU. GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND 6 OTHERS
WRIA/146/2024 · 2025-12-16
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176427 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176427 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 146 of 2024 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Shri Ajay Pratap Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous.
2. Learned counsel for the State has no objection.
3. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is hereby dismissed as infructuous.
4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
5. Consigned to record. December 16, 2025 DiVYa Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rishabh Tripathi (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Amitabh Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Secondary Edu. Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench