Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 176408 (ALL)

SAMEENA KHATOON ALIAS SHAMEENA BEGAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/12641/2025 · 2025-10-29

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12641 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned to release pensionary benefits of late Akhlaque Husain in favour of petitioner along with interest and arrears. Further prayer for a direction to opposite parties to reject and restrain entertaining claim of one Smt. Kismatun Nisha has also been sought. 3. Considering the nature of relief as prayed for by petitioner and apparent dispute regarding succession with one Smt. Kismatun Nisha, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before authority concerned, who shall consider and decide petitioner's claim within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is served on authority concerned, after affording opportunity of hearing to Smt. Kismatun Nisha, who also appears to have conflict of interest with petitioner. 4. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. October 29, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijay Kumar Verma, Vijay Prakash Chaurasia Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Sameena Khatoon Alias Shameena Begam .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench