Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1764 (ALL)

RAM SUMER YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/40147/2025 · 2026-04-01

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 40147 of 2025 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record. 2. This petition has been filed for the relief that an impleadment application filed by the petitioner in an appeal under Section 67(5) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 be allowed. Complainant is neither necessary nor proper party to the proceedings and, therefore, there is no requirement of being impleaded as respondent in the appeal. 3. This petition fails and is accordingly disposed of. April 2, 2026 Rama Kant Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : Azad Rai, C.S.C. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Ram Sumer Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAMA KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad