Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 176390 (ALL)

KAVI KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. and ANOTHER

A482/4471/2018 · 2025-11-06

Rajeev Bharti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4471 of 2018 Court No. - 23 HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Case called out. 2. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is of the year 2018. 3. It transpires from the order sheet, that vide order dated 27.02.2020 a Co- ordinate Bench observed that after getting interim order, the petitioners are not taking interest to argue the matter and they are enjoying the fruits of interim order and, therefore, on account of the said interim order the whole proceedings of the instant case before the learned court concerned is held up. On account of the said fact the interim order dated 27.03.2019 was not extended by this Court. 4. When the matter was called out, none appeared on behalf of the applicant to press this application. Learned counsel for opposite party no.2 is also not present. However, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State is present. 4. It appears that the applicant is not interested in pursuing the matter. 5. Accordingly, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution. 6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. November 6, 2025 Anand/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : J.S. Kashyap, A.K. Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Govt. Advocate, Vinod Kumar Pandey (Rajeev Bharti,J.) Kavi Kumar .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench