Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010241502022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI 0^ r FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER ^ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE & h T, PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3686 OF 2022 Between:
1. Tulugu Baiakrishna, S/o late Appalanaidu Naidu, aged about 34 R/o Polaki Village and Mandal, Srikakulam District
2. Tulugu Malleswari, W/o late Appalanaidu Naidu, aged about 34 R/o Polaki Village and Mandal, Srikakulam District years years ...Petitioner/Accused 2 and 3 AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh of A.P. Amaravati.
2. Sarika Suneetha, W/o Shanmukha Rao, aged about 30 Ullibhadra Village, Garugubilli Mandal Vizianagaram District. rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court years, R/o ...Respondents Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.260 of 2022 on the file of 1st Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Parvathipuram.
lA NO: 2 OF 2022 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay all further proceedings including appearance of Petitioners in C.C.No.260 of 2022 on the file of 1st Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Parvathipuram. Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri P Rajkumar Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Public Prosecutor (AP) Counsel for the Respondent No.2: None Appeared The Court made the following order:
r APHC010241502022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3686/2022 Between:
1.TULUGU BALAKRISHNA, S/O LATE APPALANAIDU NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS R/0 POLAKI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 2.TULUGU MALLESWARI, W/0 LATE APPALANAIDU NAIDU. AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT R/0 POLAKI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P. AMARAVATI 2.SARIKA SUNEETHA, W/0 SHANMUKHA RAO, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/0 ULLIBHADRA VILLAGE, GARUGUBILLI MANDAL VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1.P RAJKUMAR Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
2 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3686/2022
ORDER: The instant criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘Cr.P.C)/under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) has been filed by the Petitioners/Accused Nos.2 & 3, seeking quashment of the proceedings pending against them in C.C.No.260 of 2022 on the file of learned 1 Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Parvathipuram. St
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri P.Rajkumar,
learned counsel for the petitioners seeks the permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition. He would further submit that he has addressed a letter to the Registry dated 17.09.2025 to that effect.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State is in attendance.
5. In that view, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- B PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,
1. The 1st Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class: Parvathipuram, Vizianagaram District.
2. The Station House Officer, Garugubilli Police Station, Vizianagaram District.
3. One CC to Sri P Rajkumar Advocate [OPUC]
4. Two CC's to The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati [OUT]
5. Two CD Copies
#■ HIGH COURT DATED:19/09/2025
ORDER CRLP No. 3686 of 2022 a 2 0 SEP 2025 ef) VNCiirrent Sectjoc^’V DISMISSING THE CRLP AS WITHDRAWN