NARAYAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU SECY. REVENUE and 4 ORS.
WRIC/1000211/2006 · 2025-10-31
Irshad Ali
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176369 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176369 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 1000211 of 2006 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE IRSHAD ALI, J.
1. List has been revised. None for the petitioner. Sri Divesh Mishra, learned Standing Counsel is present.
2. Accordingly, the case is dismissed for want of prosecution.
3. Interim order, if any, is vacated. October 31, 2025 Gautam Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Devendra Pratap Singh, Devendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) :
C.S.C., R.N. Gupta (Irshad Ali,J.) Narayan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Secy. Revenue And 4 Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAUTAM TECKCHANDANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench