ANWAR @ BIJULI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/11683/2025 · 2025-12-03
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176361 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176361 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11683 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 228 of 2025, under sections 64(1), 333, 351(3) BNS, Sections 3/4 POCSO Act, P.S. Khargapur, District Gonda. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that allegations were levelled that the applicant came into home of applicant and misbehaved with daughter of the informant aged about 15 years. No allegations of rape was made. However in her statement under Sections 180 and 183 BNSS allegations of insertion of finger was levelled. The victim refused to undergo medical examination. The tentative age of the victim is around 16 and half years. 5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 6. Considering huge variance in the statements and refusing of the victim to undergo medial examination prima facie material to corroborate allegations of penetrative sexual assault as defined under Section ¾ POCSO Act is not made out, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 25.9.2025 and has no Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Santosh Kumar Tripathi, Mohd. Kashif Rafi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Anwar @ Bijuli .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant Anwar @ Bijuli be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
December 3, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 11683 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench