Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 176358 (ALL)

ASFAK AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS

/11093/2025 · 2025-11-20

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11093 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing counsel for the State - respondents while Sri Pankaj Gupta has accepted notice on behalf of respondent No.8. 1. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 2. Present writ petition has been filed with following prayers:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari thereby quash the impugned order dated 27.8.2025 passed by the opposite party no.2 by which he has been wrongly been admit the appeal and directed the parties not to sale the property in question as contained in Annexure No.1 to this petition, in the interest of justice...." 3. It is noticed that though the grievances raised in the present writ petition is with regard to the interim order passed by the revisional court dated 27.8.2025 for which the petitioner has approached this Court. 4. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the 5. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Kumar Singh, Vijayendra Prakash Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta Asfak And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner shall stand substantially redressed in case the revisional authority is directed to consider and decide the revision with expedition. It is noticed that the revision has been filed only last month and considering the aforesaid the petitioner is granted liberty to move appropriate application before the revisional court for expediting the proceedings and in case the revisional authority is satisfied that a case for expeditious disposal is made out, he shall pass appropriate orders thereon with expedition and in accordance with law. 6. No other ground has been urged by learned counsel for the petitioner. 7. With aforesaid direction the petition stands disposed of. 8. November 20, 2025 RKM. WRIC No. 11093 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench