VIJAY CHAUDHARY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. BASIC EDU. AND ORS.
WRIA/15257/2018 · 2025-12-18
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176348 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176348 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 15257 of 2018 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State and Mr. Prashant Kumar Singh, counsel for respondent no. 3 are present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 18, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Kumar Pandey, Pradeep Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Neeraj Chaurasiya (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Vijay Chaudhary .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Edu. And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench