Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 176343 (ALL)

PRATYUSHA RAI SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME, LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

/955/2022 · 2025-11-19

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 955 of 2022 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. C.M.Application No. IA/2/2025 (Application for Withdrawal of the Criminal Revision) 1. Heard. 2. It is stated that in terms of the compromise entered into between the parties, a copy of which is annexed as Annexure No. 1 of the application for withdrawal in terms of which, the proceedings of Complaint Case No. 6811 of 2022 under Sections 498-A, 323, 504 and 506 IPC and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, P.S.-Indira Nagar, District- Lucknow has been quashed vide order dated 12.11.2025 passed in Application U/S 482 No. 10240 of 2023 (Rachit Kulshreshtha vs. State of U.P. And Another), the revisionist wants to withdraw present revision challenging the order dated 05.07.2022 passed in Complaint Case No. 6811 of 2022 whereby the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IV, Court No. 28, Lucknow, declined to summon the opposite party Nos. 2, 3, 4 and 5 and as such, present application be allowed and the revision be dismissed as withdrawn. 3. To oppose the aforesaid prayer, no one appeared on behalf of opposite parties. 4. Taking note of aforesaid submissions as also the facts of the case, the application is liable to be allowed. It is accordingly allowed. 5. Accordingly, the revision is dismissed as withdrawn. November 19, 2025 Vinay/- Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Saurabh Gautam, Anand Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Nishant Shukla (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Pratyusha Rai Srivastava .....Revisionist(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home, Lko. And 4 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench