NANDKISHORE S/O SHRI RADHEYSHYAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/5893/2025 · 2025-05-15
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17634 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17634 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:20471] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5893/2025
1. Nandkishore S/o Shri Radheyshyam, Aged About 18 Years 9 Months, R/o Ummedpura, Police Station Masalpur, District Karauli (Rajasthan) (Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Karauli).
2. Sukhram @ Ravi S/o Shri Ramswaroop, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Ummedpura, Police Station Masalpur, District Karauli (Rajasthan) (Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Karauli). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Pal Jadoun with Mr. Harshit Kakani For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 15/05/2025
1. The petitioners have preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0060/2025 registered at Police Station-Masalpur, District-Karauli for the offence under Section 8/20 of the NDPS Act.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that though total recovery of contraband is 34.40 Kg. which is alleged to have been above the commercial quantity but that have been computed as a whole in pursuance of recovery
[2025:RJ-JP:20471] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5893/2025] made from these persons at single instance. It is evident from the FIR that from the conscious possession of the present petitioners 11.300 gram recovery has been made individually, which is below the commercial quantity. There is no criminal antecedents against the present petitioners. Petitioners are behind the Bar since
06.04.2025. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-(1) Nandkishore S/o Shri Radheyshyam and (2) Sukhram @ Ravi S/o Shri Ramswaroop shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Sunita/180