HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1671 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1.The present anticipatory bail application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in case crime No.89 of 2025 under section 61(2)(a) BNS/120-B I.P.C., P.S. Rampur Kalan, district Sitapur. 2.Heard learned counsel for the applicant, complainant's counsel Mr. Arun Kumar Saxena, who has filed vakalatnama for the complainant, which is taken on record, and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. 3.It is alleged in the prosecution case that the complainant had a land dispute against Ram Singh. For the past few days, the applicant Ajay Kumar Singh was doing pairvi for the co-accused persons. It is alleged that the accused applicant became annoyed after not receiving favourable order from the court. Hence, he hatched a conspiracy and started influencing other co-accused persons in the suit to put a shed on the land of the complainant. It is further alleged that on 3.4.2025 at about 9.00a.m., the accused applicant came from his village to Kyoti and told to place the shed and he will take care of everything. While the co- accused persons were putting the shed there, his brother Ramkumar resisted and they, all the five accused, including the applicant strangulated him and administered some poisonous substance and killed. 4.Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Prabhat Kumar Mishra, Anil Kumar , Pankaj Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Arun Kumar Saxena Ajay Kumar Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) He was not there on the date of the incident. The alleged civil suit has already been decided. The applicant has been falsely implicated for the reason that his wife is a Gram Pradhan. 5. Learned Addl. Government Advocate and complainant's counsel opposed the prayer made by applicant's counsel. Learned A.G.A. on the basis of instructions submits that one person has died in the incident. There is direct allegation against the applicant. The matter requires custodial interrogation. In the viscera report, aluminum phosphate poison has been found. It is not a case of false implication. 6.Considering the above aspects of the matter, perusal of the record, the fact that in the viscera report, poisonous substance, referred to above, has been found which corroborates the prosecution case, the offence is heinous, one person has been done to death, there is direct allegation against the applicant and prima facie, custodial interrogation may be required, no case for anticipatory bail is made out. 7.The application is accordingly dismissed. November 10, 2025 kkb/ NABAIL No. 1671 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench