TEJRAM AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. U.P. GOVT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/9861/2025 · 2025-11-03
Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary, Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176319 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176319 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9861 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J.
HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J.
1. Heard Sri Vivek Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the petitioners and R.S. Dwivedi, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State- opposite parties No.1 to 3.
2. In view of the proposed order, notice to opposite party No.4 is hereby dispensed with.
3. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have assailed the impugned FIR dated 28.09.2025 bearing FIR/Case Crime No.213 of 2025, under Sections 119(1), 115(2) & 351(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding Sections 327, 323 & 506 I.P.C.), Police Station- Nagaram, District- Lucknow, which is contained as Annexure No.1 to the writ petition, so far as it relates to the present petitioners. 4.After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioners has requested that the petitioners may be given liberty to file anticipatory bail application before the competent court of law and direction may be issued to decide the same with expedition.
5. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue and considering the aforesaid innocuous request of learned counsel for the petitioners, we hereby dispose of this writ petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioners to file anticipatory bail application before the competent court of law within a period of two weeks from today and if such anticipatory bail application is filed by the petitioners within the aforesaid stipulated time, the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vivek Kumar Verma, Chhatrapal Rawat Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Tejram And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Govt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
same may be heard and disposed of on its own merit, strictly in accordance with law, with expedition without giving any unnecessary adjournment to any of the party.
6. The writ petition is, therefore, disposed of finally. November3,2025 Suresh/ CRLP No. 9861 of 2025 2 (Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.)
Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench