ANKIT SINGH @ ANKIT SINGH DADA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/2835/2025 · 2025-10-31
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176310 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176310 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2835 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and Mr. Bhuvan Dwivedi, learned counsel for the informant.
2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.32 of 2025 under Sections 108, 308(2) BNS, P.S.- Barasgawar, District- Unnao.
3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the sister of informant committed suicide and it was stated that she was instigated by the applicant as he was blackmailing her. The cause cause of death as per the post-mortem report is ante-mortem hanging.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances and the post-mortem report, prima facie, abetment as defined under Section 108 of BNS is apparently missing in the present case coupled with the fact that the applicant is in custody since 04.03.2025 and has no previous criminal antecedent, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant- Ankit Singh @ Ankit Singh Dada be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to her furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rakesh Kumar Agarwal, Anuj Mishra, Arshad Siddiqui, Saksham Agarwal, Vinay Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Bhuvan Dwivedi Ankit Singh @ Ankit Singh Dada .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
October 31, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 2835 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench