IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.7954 of 2024 Decided on: 10th January, 2025 _________________________________________________________________ Chetna Kashyap & Ors. ....Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Anr. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioners: Ms. Rajni Gandhi, Advocate. For the respondents: Ms. Leena Guleria, Deputy Advocates General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Even though the respondents have not filed the reply, however, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, matter is heard at this stage. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the legal issue involved in the case has already been adjudicated upon; Petitioners have filed representation dated 31.07.2024 (Annexure P-7) for the redressal of their 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes - 2 - grievances raised in the writ petition, but till date the same has not been adjudicated upon; Petitioners would be satisfied in case competent authority is directed to decide the representation in accordance with law within a time bound schedule. The above is not objected to by learned Deputy Advocate General. 3. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioners in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioners. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge January 10, 2025 R.Atal