Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 176304 (ALL)

ANIL KUMAR @ TULLA LODH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

/9603/2025 · 2025-11-19

Rajeev Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9603 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Vakalatnama filed by Sri Prabhat Kumar Mishra, Advocate on behalf of opposite party no.2 is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for opposite party no.2, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The instant application has been filed with the following prayer:- "To quash the impugned charge sheet as well as entire proceeding of the Special Session Trial (SC/ST Act) No. 1188 of 2022, concerning Case Crime No. 214 of 2022, under Sections 376, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3(2)(V) SC/ST Act, Police Station- Gurubuxganj, District- Raebareli, pending in the court of learned Special Sessions Judge, SC/ST Act, District- Raebareli on the basis of the compromise and amicable settlement of the dispute between the parties dated 07-11-2025." 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which has taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as Annexure No.4 to the application. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Bharat Kumar Dixit Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Anil Kumar @ Tulla Lodh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the trial court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 7. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicant to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 8. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case. 9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if any, to the learned counsel for the applicant, after taking the photocopy of the same. November 19, 2025 Arpan A482 No. 9603 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench