Chaneshwar Yadav @ Chandeshwar Yadav v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./8589/2025 · 2025-07-02
Sandeep Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17630 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17630 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8589 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-109 Year-2024 Thana- PAUTHU District- Aurangabad ======================================================
1. Chaneshwar Yadav @ Chandeshwar Yadav S/o Saguni Yadav R/o Village- Rampur Parasiya, PS- Pauthu, District- Aurangabad
2. Fulwati Devi @ Fulwanti Devi W/o Chaneshwar Yadav @ Chandeshwar Yadav R/o Village- Rampur Parasiya, PS- Pauthu, District- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh, Sr. Advocate : Mr. Bhaskar Shankar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, APP : Mr. Adarsh Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3 02-07-2025 Heard the learned senior counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Pauthu P.S. Case No. 109 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 103(1), 238, 61(2), 123 of the B.N.S.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners along with other co-accused persons are said to have killed the daughter of the informant.
4. Learned senior counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have not committed any offence. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. The petitioners are father-in-law and mother-in-law
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8589 of 2025(3) dt.02-07-2025 2/2 of the deceased. The petitioners are in custody since 25.10.2024.
5. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this application for regular bail is allowed.
7. Accordingly, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Aurangabad/concerned Court below in connection with Pauthu P.S. Case No. 109 of 2024.
8. This application for regular bail stands allowed.
anand/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T