Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17630 (AP)

Y. VENKATA REDDY v. THE STATE OF A.P.

WP/12577/2025 · 2025-07-22

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010240432025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 12577/2025 Between: 1. Y. VENKATA REDDY, S/O VENKATA SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS. OCCUPATION CONTRACTOR R/O H.NO 4-1-763/2, ANJANEYA NAGAR, BADVEL ANDHRA PRADESH 516227 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF A P, PANCHYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEERIV, RWS AND S DEPARTMENT, C- BLOCK, VASUDHA TOWERS, SAIPURAM COLONY, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL DISTRICT, KURNOOL. 4. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PARISHAD, KURNOOL DISTRICT, KURNOOL. 5. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, (RWS AND S) PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 6. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, (RWS AND S) PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, KURNOOL DIVISION, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 7. B SUNKANNA, S/O. BASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O. D.NO.2/442, BC COLONY, NAGARADONA VILLAGE, CHIPPAGIRI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction preferably a Writ in the nature of Mandamus for declaring the action of the Respondents more particularly the 5th Respondent in not finalising the Tender which 2 concluded on 27.03.2025 by executing agreement to the Petitioner who is successful bidder in respect of Tender Notice No. ATO/81 to 124/2024-2025, dated 03.03.2025 issued by the respondent No.5 inviting tenders through E- Procurement for Operation and Maintenance of CPWS schemes namely Khajipuram, M.Agraharam and 07 other Habitations in Kurnool District for the year, 2025-2026 with Tender ID 790143 on the pretext that there is stay order in WP.No.7581/2025 when there is no stay order is illegal, arbitrary, contrary to Go.Ms.No.2290 dated 20.12.2012 read with subsequent GO.Ms.No.1292 dated 6.8.2013 and violative of Article 14, 19 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequent direct the 5th Respondent to finalise the subject tender by executing agreement to the 1st Petitioner forthwith and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N BHARATH SIMHA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 23rd July, 2025 cbn 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA W.P.No.12577 of 2025 23rd July, 2025 CBN 219