Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 176268 (ALL)

RASHMI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

/9140/2022 · 2025-12-08

Manjive Shukla

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9140 of 2022 Court No. - 21 HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today by the applicants, is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State and Shri Ravi Kant and Shri Saurabh Sharma, learned counsels appearing for Opposite Party No. 2. 3. The captioned petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed inter alia, praying therein for the following relief:- "Wherefore it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the summoning order dated 04.08.2022 as well as the entire complaint, related to case no. 3839/2019, Abhishek Kumar Versus Rajendra Prasad Savita and others, Under Section 323/504/506 IPC, P.S. - Wazirganj, Lucknow pending in the Court of Special Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (A.P.), Lucknow (contained as Annexure No. 1 & 2 to this petition) passed by the court below in the interest of justice." 4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that after filing of this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., parties have entered into a compromise and that compromise has been verified by the learned trial court i.e. learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate V, Court No. 29, Lucknow vide order dated 21.11.2025 passed in Case No. 3839 of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajesh Kumar Srivastava, Praveen Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Ravi Kant, Saurabh Sharma Rashmi And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 2019, Abhishek Kumar Versus Rajendra Prasad Savita and others. 5. It has been submitted that since the parties have already entered into compromise and the offences, subject matter of this petition, are petty in nature therefore, this Court may kindly quash the proceedings of the entire case. 6. Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State has not disputed about the veracity of the compromise entered into between the parties and has also not disputed the order passed by the learned trial court, thereby verifying the veracity of the compromise amongst the parties. 7. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing for the parties and I find that the parties have entered into a compromise and that compromise has been verified by the learned trial court vide order dated 21.11.2025. Certified copy of the order dated 21.11.2025 has been filed by the applicants along with the supplementary affidavit at Page No's. 11 and 12. 8. Since the parties have entered into a compromise and that compromise has been verified by the learned trial court, this Court is of the view that the instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is liable to be allowed. Accordingly, same is allowed. 9. The entire proceedings of Case No. 3839 of 2019, Abhishek Kumar Versus Rajendra Prasad Savita and others, registered under Sections 323, 504 & 506 I.P.C. related to Police Station - Wazirganj, District - Lucknow, pending before the learned Special Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, C.B.I. (A.P.), Lucknow, are hereby quashed. December 8, 2025 Lokesh Kumar A482 No. 9140 of 2022 2 (Manjive Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench