KAMAL KUMAR MISHRA v. SRI GYANENDRA KUMAR, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION, LKO.
CAPL/2330/2024 · 2025-11-07
Manish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176264 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176264 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2330 of 2024 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.
1. Heard.
2. The present contempt application has been preferred against the alleged non-compliance of judgement and order dated 2.2.2024 passed in Writ-A No.760 of 2024, the relevant extract of the order is quoted hereinbelow:
"Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before opposite party No.2 i.e. Assistant Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organization, Lucknow who shall consider and decide the same within period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of."
3. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that till date the representation as directed by the writ court has not been decided by the respondent, which is nothing but willful and intentional disobedience of the order passed by the writ court.
4. After hearing learned counsel for the applicant and going through the record , it is found that the compliance affidavit has been filed by the Respondent No.2 on 16.08.2025 enclosing therein the copy of order dated 5.8.2025 by which the representation of the applicant has been decided in compliance of judgement and order passed by the writ court. The submission of learned counsel for the applicant is found to be incorrect. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shiv Sharan Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Akhilesh Pratap Singh Kamal Kumar Mishra .....Applicant(s) Sri Gyanendra Kumar, Assistant Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organization, Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
5. In view of discussion made hereinabove, the order passed by the writ court has been complied with and the writ petition has become infructuous and it is dismissed as such.
6. The notice, if any, issued against the respondent stands discharged. November 7, 2025 S. Kumar CAPL No. 2330 of 2024 2 (Manish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench