Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 176257 (ALL)

Udai Pratap Singh v. Deepak Sharma and Others

/17/2025 · 2025-12-08

Jaspreet Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW S.C.C. REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 17 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. Order on Application bearing No.1/2025 seeking condonation of delay. 1. It has been reported that the instant revision is beyond limitation. 2. Shri Utkarsh Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondents does not seriously oppose the application seeking condonation of delay. 3. The Court has considered the said application seeking condonation of delay, supported by an affidavit and the grounds shown is found sufficient. Accordingly, the application is allowed and the delay is condoned. Order on the Revision 4. Heard Shri Brijesh Kumar Bajpai, learned counsel for the revisionist and Shri Utkarsh Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondents. 5. It has been informed that the parties have agreed amongst themselves that the revisionist herein would pay rent/damages to the respondents @ Rs.10,000/- per month from 25.07.2025 till the date he vacates the premises in question, latest being up till 31.03.2026. 6. It has also been pointed out that the revisionist has filed an undertaking to the aforesaid effect which is on record. Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Brijesh Kumar Bajpai Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Utkarsh Srivastava Udai Pratap Singh .....Revisionist(s) Deepak Sharma And Others .....Opposite Party(s) 7. Shri Utkarsh Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondents submits that they abide and agree with the aforesaid conditions. 8. It has also been informed by the parties that the revisionist has deposited money relating to arrears and damages while the suit was pending for the benefit of the landlord. The said amount can be withdrawn by the respondents. 9. In view of the aforesaid, the instant revision is disposed of in terms of the agreement arrived at between the parties that the revisionist would vacate the disputed premises latest by 31.03.2026 and shall continue to pay the damages @ Rs.10,000/- per month from the date of the judgment passed by the trial Court dated 25.07.2025 till the date he vacates the premises and latest by 31.03.2026. The judgment passed by the trial Court dated 25.07.2025 shall stand modified to the aforesaid extent. 10. It is made clear that in case if the aforesaid undertaking is breached, it shall be construed as deliberate violation of the order passed by the Court and would entail contempt proceedings for the revisionist. December 8, 2025 Rakesh/- SCCRD No. 17 of 2025 2 (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench