Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 176256 (ALL)

ANAND NISHAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

BAIL/10940/2025 · 2025-11-15

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10940 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. None appears for informant in terms of FIR. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 436 of 2025, under Sections 87, 137(2), 64(1) BNS, Sections 3/4 POCSO Act, Section 3(2)(v) SC/ST Act, P.S. Jalalpur, District Ambedkarnagar. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that it was alleged that daughter of informant aged about 16 years used to talk with the applicant. Subsequently she was enticed by the applicant. In her statement under Sections 180 and 183 BNSS the victim admitted to have gone with the applicant to Delhi and thereafter to Prayagraj. The tentative age of the victim is around 27 years. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the two statements not supporting the prosecution story, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 7.10.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Anand Nishad be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Prem Prakash Singh, Javed Khan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Anand Nishad .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 15, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 10940 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench