Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17625 (GAU)

MUSSTT PARIJAN BEGUM v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS

WP(C)/4737/2023 · 2025-03-27

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010180162023 2025:GAU-AS:3641 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4737/2023 MUSSTT PARIJAN BEGUM WIFE OF LATE MAKIBUR RAHMAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KARIA (BOTKATA), P.O. AND P.S.- NALBARI, IN THE DISTRICT OF NALBARI, ASSAM, PIN- 781335. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006. 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006. 3:THE PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT GENERAL ( A AND E) ASSAM MAIDAMGAON BELTOLA GUWAHATI- 781028 IN THE DISTRICT OF KAMRUP(METRO) ASSAM. 4:THE DIRECTOR OF PENSION Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM HOUSEFED COMPLEX DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006 . 5:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BAKSA MUSHALPUR BTR ASSAM. 6:MUSSTT. MEERA RAHMAN C/O- LATE MAKIBUR RAHMAN RESIDENT OF SHANTIPUR NALBARI P.O. AND P.S.- NALBARI IN THE DISTRICT OF NALBARI ASSAM PIN- 781335 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B K BHAGAWATI, MS P HALDER Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MR N BARMAN (R-6),MR B DEORI (R-6),MS J BARMAN (R-6),SC, AG,SC, FINANCE BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE O R D E R 28.03.2025 Mr. B.K. Bhagawati, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the issue raised in this writ petition is a dispute between the petitioner and the respondent no.6, which is purely disputed question of facts. Therefore, he Page No.# 3/3 submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to avail the appropriate remedy, as may be permissible under the law. Mr. J.K. Goswami, learned Addl. Senior Govt. Advocate for the respondent no.1 and Mr. S.K. Medhi, learned Standing Counsel for the Accountant General are present. In view of the fair submission of Mr. Bhagawati, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands closed on withdrawal with a liberty, as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant