Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 176223 (ALL)

WASID BEG v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. AND 3 OTHERS

BAIL/603/2025 · 2025-11-25

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 603 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned AGA for the State. 2. This is the second bail application. The first bail application was dismissed as not pressed on 26.11.2024. 3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 273 of 2024 under Section 70(2) of BNS and Section 3(2)(5) of SC/ST Act and Section 5(g)/6 of POCSO Act registered at P.S. Mishrikh, District Sitapur. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the daughter of the informant was enticed away by the applicant and wrong was committed on her. In her statement under Section 180 BNSS, the victim stated that the applicant had committed wrong on her, the victim refused to undergo medical examination. There is no definite document with regard to the exact age of the victim. 5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the refusal of the victim to undergo medical examination, apart from the statement, there is no material exists against the applicant and as such, the applicant who is in jail since 25.08.2024 and has one criminal history which is explained, is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant Wasid Beg be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Girish Kumar Pandey, Umesh Dixit Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Wasid Beg .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 25, 2025 Anurag BAIL No. 603 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench