RAJKUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO.
BAIL/12588/2024 · 2025-11-11
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176216 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176216 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12588 of 2024
Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.443 of 2024, under Section 64(1) BNS, P.S. Chinhat, District Lucknow.
3. FIR in question was lodged alleging that daughter of the informant aged about 24 years informed the informant that the applicant, who is uncle, had committed wrong on her. In the statement under Section 180 BNSS, the victim stated that on the date of the incident, the applicant was called and finger was inserted in the private part. It was also stated that her dog was sleeping adjacent to her. Medical on record does not corroborate the allegation.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the age of the victim which is 24 years and the medical not corroborating the allegation, the applicant who is in custody since 17.09.2024 and has one case of criminal antecedents in which he is on bail, is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shantanu Sharma, Amit Kumar Awasthi, Anshuman Sharma, Ashish Mishra, Athar Ali, Avinash Pandey, Babita Verma, Razia Khan, Shri Prakash, Sudhaker Prakash Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rajkumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Let the applicant Rajkumar be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 11, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 12588 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench