Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 176207 (MAD)

TAMILARASI v. THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER

WP/48802/2025 · 2025-12-17

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 48802 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-12-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 48802 of 2025 1. TAMILARASI Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Revenue Officer The District Revenue Office, Krishnagiri District. 2.The Tahsildar Krishnagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District. 3.The Taluk Head Surveyor, Krishnagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District. Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the 2nd and 3rd respondents to consider the petitioners representation dated 15.09.2025 and thereby direct the respondents to issue a computer patta in the petitioners same for the property in Survey No.710 and TS No.260 situated at Vediyappan Kovil street, Boganapalli Revenue Village, Krishnagiri Taluk and District as per the sale deed in Document No.1373 of 1997 dated 10.11.1997 to an extent of 875 sq.ft For Petitioner(s): Mr.B.Sundarapandiyan For Respondent(s): Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja Govt Advocate ORDER This writ petition has been filed for a mandamus seeking for a direction to the second and third respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 15.09.2025, seeking for issuance of computer patta in favour of the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 48802 of 2025 petitioner for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2. Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s representation as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with law within a time frame to be fixed by this Court after hearing the objections of the neighbouring land owners if any and any other third party whom the second respondent deems fit to enquire. 4. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation dated 15.09.2025. 5. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the second respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s representation dated 15.09.2025, seeking for issuance of computer patta in the name of the petitioner for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order after hearing the objections of the neighbouring land owners if any and any other third party whom the second respondent deems fit to enquire. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 48802 of 2025 6. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No Costs. 17-12-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No ab To 1.The District Revenue Officer The District Revenue Office, Krishnagiri District. 2.The Tahsildar Krishnagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District. 3.The Taluk Head Surveyor, Krishnagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 48802 of 2025 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab WP No. 48802 of 2025 17-12-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis