APHC010241032025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] FRIDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 13003/2025 Between: Gangineni Saraswathi ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 13003/2025 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India seeking the following reliefs:- “to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 3rd respondent in not disposing the Revision Petition dated 04.02.2025 filed by the petitioner under Section 9 of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 1971 questioning the illegal mutation of land admeasuring Ac.9.89 cents out of Ac.40.92 cents in Sy.No.30 situated at Perumallapadu Revenue Village, Chejarla Mandal, SPSR Nellore District as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to consider and dispose of the said Revision Petition expeditiously in accordance with law and pass such other order.” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents. 3. Though the petitioner made several allegations against the respondents, during hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner requested this Court, without touching the merits of the case, to issue a direction to the respondents to dispose of the revision petition dated 04.02.2025 filed by the petitioner. 3 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue readily agreed to dispose of the revision petition dated 04.02.2025, if any pending with the respondents. 5. In view of the submission of the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, this Court need not decide the truth or otherwise of the allegations made in the petition. This Court is conscious that no such direction be issued, in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in “The Government of India v. P.Venkatesh1”, wherein the Apex Court held that such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do not serve to the cause of justice. As the learned counsel for the petitioner himself requested to issue a direction to dispose of the revision petition dated 04.02.2025, this Court find no other alternative except to issue such direction. 6. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to consider and dispose of the revision petition dated 04.02.2025 filed by the petitioner, after providing opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, within a period of four(4) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. 1 2019 (8) SCALE 544 4 As a sequel miscellaneous application, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 09.05.2025 TTPPSS 5 245 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 13003/2025 09.05.2025 TTPPSS