ESAZ @ ESAZ KHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. LKO AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/9388/2025 · 2025-11-03
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176183 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176183 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9388 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Counter affidavit filed by learned AGA is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State. Whereas, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the informant despite notice. 3. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.135 of 2025 under Sections 64(1), 351(3) BNS and Section 3/4 of POCSO Act, P.S.- Behta Mujawar, District- Unnao. 4. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the daughter of the informant, aged about 16 years, was called by the applicant and wrong was committed on her on 28.04.2025. In the statement recorded under Section 180 BNSS, the victim stated that she used to talk to the applicant since the last three years. Medical on record does not corroborate with the allegations levelled in the FIR. 5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances and the medico-legal examination report coupled with the fact that the applicant is in custody since 25.05.2025 and has no previous criminal antecedent, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sagar Singh, Shri Ram Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Esaz @ Esaz Khan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Lko And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
7. Let the applicant- Esaz @ Esaz Khan be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to her furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
November 3, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 9388 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench