HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10588 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the petitioner challenges the order dated 21st January, 2024 passed by respondent No.3 rejecting the claim of the petitioner under the Mukhyamantri Krishak Durghatna Kalyan Yojna. 3. Upon perusal of the said order, we are of the view that the authority concerned has not taken into consideration the various documents produced by the petitioner in relation to her claim under the said scheme. 4. In light of the same, the impugned order is quashed and set aside with a direction upon respondent No.3 to grant another opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and thereafter pass a reasoned order upon considering the relevant documents produced by the petitioner. 5. The entire exercise should be completed within a period of 12 weeks from date. 6. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. November 4, 2025 Ashutosh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rinku Verma, Ajeet Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Smt. Savita .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench