Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17615 (AP)

DR.B.RAMACHANDRAIAH v. DR.K.NAGI REDDY & 10 OTHERS

CRLRC/1618/2008 · 2025-08-13

T Mallikarjuna Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010240812008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No: 1618/2008 Between: 1. DR.B.RAMACHANDRAIAH, S/O LATE SUBBA REDDY, CIVIL ASST. SURGEON, RIMS HOSPITAL R/O MARUTHI NAGAR, KADAPA. ...PETITIONER AND 1. DR K NAGI REDDY, S/O NAGI REDDY, FORMERLY DCHS MEDICAL SUPERINTENDENT R/O PLOT NO.13, 11-5-57/5, ROAD NO.14, S.V.COLONY, SAROORNAGAR, 2. T RAMAKRISHNA, S/O VENKATASWAMY, RETD. C.I. D.NO.484-CB, OMSANTHI NAGAR, KADAPA - 516 002. 3. V SUBRAHMANYAM, S/O VENKATASUBBAIAH, RETD. A.O. VIGNANA SUDHA DEGREE COLLEGE, MURAGARIPALLI, KONGAREDDYPALLI, CHITTOOR. 4. V CHANDRASEKHAR, S/O NAGALINGAM, FORMERLY SR.ASST. DIST. HOSPITAL KADAPA. NOW PRACTING ADVOCATE R/O D.NO.20/577-2, NAMASTHE BOARD LANE, 5. C VENKATA REDDY, S/O CHINNAPA REDDY, O/O THE N.G.O.HOME, GORLA MADDIDU (VILLAGE), RAYACHOTI MANDAL, 6. P SREENIVASULU, S/O RAMA CHANDRAIAH, SR. ASST. (RETD.) GROUND WATER DEPARTMENT, RETIRED AND RESIDING AT KADAPA. 7. DR R VENUGOPAL KRISHNA M S D O, S/O NARAYANA, FORMERLY DCHS MEDICAL SUPERINTENDENT DIST. HOSPITAL, KADAPA. RETD. AS JOINT COMMISSIONER, A.P.V.V.P., HYDERABAD AND NOW WORKING AS PROFESSOR AND H.O.D., OPTHAMOLOGY DEPT., S.V.S.MEDICAL COLLEGE, 8. M DEVA VARA PRASAD, S/O SATYANANDAM, OFFICE SUPERINTENDENT O/O D.M. & H.O., KADAPA. 9. P NARAYANA REDDY, S/O SUBBA REDDY, SR. ASST. A.P.V.V.P., AREA HOSPITAL, JAMMALAMADUGU, 10. T PRABHU DAS, S/O T.GEORGE, SR. ASST. O/O THE MEDICAL SUPERINTENDENT, RIMS, KADAPA. 11. THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P., HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased toto allow the Crl.R.C., by setting aside the Order in Crl.R.P.No.6 of 2007, dated 04.08.08 on the file of the IV Addl. Sessions Judge at Cuddapah. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M N NARASIMHA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. M JAYARAM REDDY 2. PONNADA SREE VYAS 3. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.MALLIKARJUNA RAO Criminal Revision Case No.1618 of 2008 ORDER: Learned counsel for the respondents filed memo along with certain documents dated 23.03.2023 of the trial Court i.e., Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kadapa, which shows that the complainant called absent, no representation and process is not filed and the complaint is dismissed under Section 204(4) of Cr.P.C. 2. Since this Criminal Revision Case is filed questioning the orders passed in Crl.M.P.No.92 of 2006, dated 11.01.2007 and in view of the dismissal of complaint, the Criminal Revision Case has become infructuous as cause does not survive. 3. In the result, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as cause does not survive. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J Date: 14.08.2025 M K K