KAMLESH CHANDRA MISHRA v. U.P.JAL NIGAM THRU MANAGING DIRECTOR LUCKNOW and ANR.
WRIA/728/2020 · 2025-12-09
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176131 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176131 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 728 of 2020 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 9, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Sharma, G.S.Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : Rishabh Kapoor (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Kamlesh Chandra Mishra .....Petitioner(s) U.P.Jal Nigam Thru Managing Director Lucknow And Anr. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench