Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17613 (CHH)

GUNASAGAR YADAV v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRA/767/2025 · 2025-04-16

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:17493 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRA No. 767 of 2025 Gunasagar Yadav S/o Shri Peetambar Yadav Aged About 23 Years R/o. Village- Godhikala, (Bhatamuda), Thana And Tahsil - Patthalgaon, Distt.- Jashpur (C.G.) ... Appellant(s) versus State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House OfÏcer, Police Station- Patthalgaon, Distt.- Jashpur (C.G.) ...Respondent(s) For Appellant : Mr. Sunil Sahu, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Ms. Ankita Shukla, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 16 .04. 2025 1. Proceedings of this matter have been taken through video conferencing. 2. Heard Mr. Sunil Sahu, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Ms. Ankita Shukla, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the respondent/State. BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2025.04.22 14:22:11 +0530 2 3. As per ofÏce report dated 11.04.2025, it transpires that the present appeal is stated to be not maintainable as the impugned order dated 18.03.2025 has been passed by the learned Additional Session Judge, Patthalgaon, District Jashpur (C.G.) and the objection has also been raised by the learned State counsel that in view of the provisions contained in Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, the bail application ought to have been filed before the learned Special Judge (SC/ST) Act, to which learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present appeal with a liberty to file afresh before the appropriate forum. 4. Learned State counsel has no objection. 5. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Brijmohan