1 criappln-39-2024 IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 29 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 39 OF 2024 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1977 OF 2024 MANOJ PRAKASHCHAND JAIN VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER …. Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Joydeep Chatterji h/f Mr. Ameya J. Bhat and Mr. Akshay D. Kulkarni APP for Respondent No.1-State : Mr. S.A. Gaikwad Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Ambar S. Barlota …. CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI & SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, JJ. Dated : 04th April 2025 PER COURT :- ORDER IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1977 OF 2024 : 1. Learned Advocate Mr. Joydeep Chatterji h/f Mr. Akshay D. Kulkarni for the applicant submits that the application has become infructuous, which was for direction to dispense with the physical appearance of the applicant. 2. In view of the said statement, the application stands disposed off as infructuous. 2025:BHC-AUG:10250-DB 2 criappln-39-2024 ORDER IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 39 OF 2024 : 3. Respondent No.2 was served way back around 02.02.2024. He had not caused any appearance. Now, all of a sudden, learned Advocate Mr. Ambar S. Barlota submits that respondent No.2 has given instructions to him to appear in the matter and it is telephonic instructions. 4. We deprecate such kind of practice. When the matter was on board, so many time respondent No.2 has not taken any pain to appear in the matter. Now, just to prolong the matter, it appears that he is taking the step. However, to uphold the justice, we grant adjournment subject to costs of Rs.5,000/- to be deposited with the High Court Legal Services Sub Committee, Aurangabad, within a period of one week. 5. The learned Advocate may file his Vakalatnama during that period. 6. Place the matter for further consideration on 24.04.2025. [ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH ] JUDGE [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI ] JUDGE asd