HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5833 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has made a statement at the Bar that investigation in the instant case has already been concluded and charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioners. 3. Learned AGA for the State could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 4. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. November 10, 2025 KU Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Rishabh Pathak (As Per F.I.R. Shubham Singh) And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench