MANGRU PRAJAPATI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO.
BAIL/5011/2024 · 2025-11-03
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176114 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176114 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5011 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA, Sri Ram Singh,
learned counsel for the informant and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.0154 of 2023, under Sections 302, 201, 34 IPC, P.S. Jamo, District Amethi.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that as the co-accused Dayaram Yadav has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 03.11.2025 passed in Criminal Misc Bail Application No.14950 of 2023; the applicant being maternal grand father of the deceased child and no specific allegation has been levelled against him and aged about 55 years, hence, he may be enlarged on bail
4. Learned A.G.A. and learned counsel for the informant have strongly opposed the bail application, however could not dispute the aforesaid
facts.
5. Considering the fact that co-accused Daya Ram has been enlarged on bail and the applicant is aged about 55 years, this Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.
6. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
7. Let the applicant Mangru Prajapati be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on her furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ramakar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Ashish Singh, Ram Singh Mangru Prajapati .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 3, 2025 Renu/- BAIL No. 5011 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- RENU AGARWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench