Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17611 (HP)

MANOJ KUMAR v. THE HRTC AND ANOTHER

EX.P./790/2025 · 2025-07-01

Sandeep Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.790 of 2025 Date of Decision: 01.07.2025 _______________________________________________________ Manoj Kumar …….Petitioner Versus HRTC & Anr. … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Dheeraj K.Vashisht, Advocate. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): While placing on record communication dated 30.06.2025, issued under the signatures of General Manager (Admin), HRTC, Shimla, Mr. Dheeraj K.Vashisht, learned counsel for the respondents, states that mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, stands complied with. He states that services of the petitioner have been regularized w.e.f. 31.12.2012. 2. Having perused aforesaid communication, this Court finds that appropriate direction already stands issued to Divisional Manager, Himachal Road Transport Corporation, Dharamshala as well as Regional Manager, Himachal Road Transport Corporation, Baijnath to do the needful and thereafter, pay fixation order of the 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 petitioner from the back date be sent to the Head Office immediately for further course of action. 3. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly, the same is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to ensure that pay fixation order and release of arrears, if any, shall be issued/released expeditiously, preferably within six weeks, failing which, petitioner would be at liberty to get the present proceedings revived, so that appropriate action, in accordance with law, is taken towards implementation of the judgment/ order, sought to be executed in the instant proceedings. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge July 01, 2025 (sunil)