Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17610 (MAD)

M/s.VIDVEDAA PRG AIRPORT RETAIL TRZ PVT LTD., v. AIRPORT DIRECTOR

Arb O.P(COM.DIV.)/42/2025 · 2025-02-17

P B Balaji

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Arb.O.P Nos. 42, 45 to 49, 51 to 71 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 28.07.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Arb.O.P Nos. 42, 45 to 49, 51 to 71 of 2025 M/s.Nissi Engineering Solution Pvt. Ltd., Chennai. ...Petitioner in all OPs vs. Kinsleen R ...Respondent in Arb O.P.42/2025 Selva Kumar M ...Respondent in Arb O.P.45/2025 Karthik D ...Respondent in Arb O.P.46/2025 Ranjithkumar M ...Respondent in Arb O.P.47/2025 Karthikeyan M ...Respondent in Arb O.P.48/2025 Siva M ...Respondent in Arb O.P.49/2025 Udaya Abinesh R ...Respondent in Arb O.P.51/2025 Manikandan S ...Respondent in Arb O.P.52/2025 Akilan M ...Respondent in Arb O.P.53/2025 Kannan B ...Respondent in Arb O.P.54/2025 MD Shah Alam ...Respondent in Arb O.P.55/2025 Kasi Vishal K.P. ...Respondent in Arb O.P.56/2025 Ajithkumar A ...Respondent in Arb O.P.57/2025 Abdul Mukshith C.J. ...Respondent in Arb O.P.58/2025 Shuvam Mitra ...Respondent in Arb O.P.59/2025 Vinoth M ...Respondent in Arb O.P.60/2025 Santhosh Kumar S ...Respondent in Arb O.P.61/2025 Anbu Manikandan D ...Respondent in Arb O.P.62/2025 Mohamed Safeek P ...Respondent in Arb O.P.63/2025 Immanuel Raja A ...Respondent in Arb O.P.64/2025 Godson J ...Respondent in Arb O.P.65/2025 Guruprasath C ...Respondent in Arb O.P.66/2025 Hakkim Arsath M ...Respondent in Arb O.P.67/2025 Mohamed Rilwan A ...Respondent in Arb O.P.68/2025 Sureshkumar M ...Respondent in Arb O.P.69/2025 Mohamed Hasan M ...Respondent in Arb O.P.70/2025 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb.O.P Nos. 42, 45 to 49, 51 to 71 of 2025 Karthikeyan M ...Respondent in Arb O.P.71/2025 For Petitioner : Mr.T.Harish Chowdhary (in all Ops) COMMON ORDER These petitions have been filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking for appointment of an arbitrator. 2. There seems to be a dispute between the petitioner and the respective respondents arising out of Agreements for Training cum Services, dated 10.08.2022, 04.09.2023, 27.11.2023, 17.10.2023, 27.11.2023, 13.12.2022, 06.12.2022, 25.04.2022, 22.05.2023, 26.10.2022, 18.01.2024, 03.10.2023, 18.06.2024, 17.07.2023, 20.02.2024, 19.12.2022, 14.06.2023, 11.09.2023, 21.08.2023, 25.02.2022, 19.06.2023, 25.09.2023, 21.08.2023, 02.02.2023, 02.08.2023, 01.10.2024, 24.07.2023. There exist an arbitration clause in the aforesaid Agreements for Training cum Services, which are the subject matters of the disputes between the parties. 3. The petitioner has invoked arbitration in accordance with the arbitration clause by issuing notice to the respective respondents to comply with the requirements of Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and in those notices, the petitioner has nominated 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb.O.P Nos. 42, 45 to 49, 51 to 71 of 2025 their arbitrator. Since there is no consensus between the parties with regard to the name of the Arbitrator, these petitions have been filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking for appointment of an Arbitrator. 4. Since there exists an arbitration clause in the aforesaid Agreements for Training cum Services, which are the subject matter of the dispute between the parties, and since the petitioner has invoked arbitration by issuing notice to the respective respondents to comply with Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, this Court is issuing notice to the respective respondents, through Court as well as privately returnable by 19.08.2025. 5. Post these matters on 19.08.2025. 28.07.2025 Maya 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb.O.P Nos. 42, 45 to 49, 51 to 71 of 2025 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. Maya Arb.O.P Nos. 42, 45 to 49, 51 to 71 of 2025 Dated : 28.07.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis