( 2025:JHHC:23966 ) -1- A.B.A. No. 4451 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4451 of 2025 1. Umar Kaji Miyan, aged about 61 years, S/o Late Charku Miyan 2. Lukman Ansari, aged about 37 years, S/o Ishaq Miyan 3. Afjatul Ansari, aged about 25 years, S/o Umar Kaji Miyan 4. Ishaq Miyan, aged about 69 years, S/o Late Abdul Miyan 5. Naim Ansari, aged about 28 years, S/o Late Ishaq Miyan 6. Yunus Ansari, aged about 34 years, S/o Ishaq Ansari 7. Javed Ansari, aged about 36 years, S/o Umar Kaji Miyan 8. Amir Hussain Kaji @ Chunnu Ansari, aged about 35 years, S/o Umar Kaji Miyan All resident of Village Phulpahari, P.O. & P.S. Littipara, District-Pakur (Jharkhand) … Petitioners -Versus- The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Petitioners : Md. Yasir Arafat, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, A.P.P. ----- 05/18.08.2025 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Littipara P.S. Case No.26/2025, registered for the offence under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(2), 109(1), 74, 352, 351(2) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, pending in the Court of the learned A.C.J.M., Pakur. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are neighbours of the informant. He submits that the altercation took place for water drainage. He further submits that there are case and counter case and first case being Littipara P.S. Case No.25/2025 has been lodged by petitioner no.1 and, thereafter, the present case has been lodged. He submits that so far as petitioner nos. 5 and 7 are concerned, there are general and omnibus allegations against them also. 3. Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations of assault are there due to which injury has also been received by the informant. ( 2025:JHHC:23966 ) -2- A.B.A. No. 4451 of 2025 4. Looking into the FIR, it transpires that there is direct allegation against Naim Ansari and Javed Ansari, who are petitioner nos. 5 and 7 respectively and in view of that, their prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. 5. So far as petitioner nos. 1 to 4, 6 and 8 are concerned, it appears that there are general and omnibus allegations against them and in the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to petitioner nos. 1 to 4, 6 and 8. 6. Accordingly, petitioner nos. 1 to 4, 6 and 8, namely, Umar Kaji Miyan, Lukman Ansari, Afjatul Ansari, Ishaq Miyan, Yunus Ansari and Amir Hussain Kaji @ Chunnu Ansari respectively are directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Pakur in connection with Littipara P.S. Case No.26/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Ajay/