Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17608 (BOM)

Ravindra Sudam Patil v. The State of Maharashtra through its Principal Secretary

CP/416/2025 · 2025-08-08

Shri N B Suryawanshi, Shri Sandipkumar C More

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(1) 910- C. P. 410-2025.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONT. PETITION NO. 410 OF 2025 IN WP/12979/2024 SHARAD PANDURANG PATIL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA WITH CONT. PETITION NO. 406 OF 2025 IN WP/12981/2024 KETANKUMAR BAPURAO SHINDE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY WITH CONT. PETITION NO. 407 OF 2025 IN WP/13084/2024 MAHESH NANABHAU PATIL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY SCHOOL EDUCATION AND SPORTS DEPARTMENT WITH CONT. PETITION NO. 412 OF 2025 IN WP/13055/2024 MADHURI GOKUL PATIL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY WITH CONT. PETITION NO. 414 OF 2025 IN WP/12996/2024 DIPAK DHANRAJ PATIL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (2) 910- C. P. 410-2025.odt WITH CONT. PETITION NO. 416 OF 2025 IN WP/13063/2024 RAVINDRA SUDAM PATIL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY .. Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Y. V. Gandhe h/f Mr. P.D. Bachate AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. S. R. Yadav Lonikar .. CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ. DATED : 08th AUGUST, 2025 ORDER:- 1. Learned Advocate for the petitioners, on instructions, submits that the order is complied with. The said position is confirmed by learned A.G.P. 2. In view of the compliance of the order, Contempt Petition is disposed of. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ) JUDGE JUDGE Y.S. Kulkarni