HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10348 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Lalji Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing counsel for respondent No.s 1 to 5. 2. In light of the order proposed to be passed notice to the respondents is dispensed with. 3. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner purchased land of Gata No. 761, area 2.5290 hectares, situated at Village - Ohoolpur Mauri, Pargana - Bihar, Tehsil - Kunda, District - Pratapgarh by means of registered sale deed dated 09.01.2024 from its earstwhile owner Shiv Bhagwan. Since the boundaries of Gata No. 761 were not clear, the petitioner initiated proceedings under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, before the Sub Divisional Officer, Kunda, Pratapgarh. In the proceedings under Section 116, interim order was passed on 24.06.2025, directing the parties to maintain status quo. Despite passing of order dated 24.06.2025, the private respondents started cultivation on the disputed land, due to which the petitioner approached the revenue officials as well as local Police, but no action has been taken. Hence, petitioner has filed present writ petition seeking compliance of order dated 24.06.2025. 4. It has been submitted that despite passing of order dated 24.06.2025 as well as endorsement order dated 20.08.2025, the State- authorities are not taking any action for ensuring compliance of the aforesaid orders. 5. Learned Standing counsel, on the other hand, submits that the petitioner has equally efficacious and alternate remedy of executing the orders of revenue court as per Para 460 of U.P. Revenue Court Manual where an order of revenue authority can be executed. 6. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that liberty may be granted to the petitioner to approach the competent authority under Para 460 of U.P. Revenue Court Manual for execution of the orders passed by the Prescribed Authority as well as of the other authorities. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Lalji Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ankit Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Revenue Lko. And 11 Others .....Respondent(s) 7. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach competent authority by moving appropriate application under para 460 of Revenue Court Manual to execute the orders of the revenue authorities. In case, such an application is moved within two weeks from today the same shall be disposed of expeditiously. November 6, 2025 A. Verma WRIC No. 10348 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench