ARUN KUMAR @ ARUN KUMAR AWASTHI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
/8700/2024 · 2025-11-19
Rajeev Bharti, Rajnish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176053 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176053 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8700 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None appears on behalf of the petitioner nor there is any request for adjournment or pass over the case.
3. It appears that either the petition has lost its efficacy or the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter
4. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. November 19, 2025 Ajit Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shri Prakash Pandey, Devesh Shukla, Rakesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Arun Kumar @ Arun Kumar Awasthi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AJIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench