[2025:RJ-JP:17664] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No. 96/2023 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition NO.2633/2019 Vinita Kumari D/o Hukam Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Ajitpura, Tehsil Dhod, District Sikar. ----Petitioner/Non applicant Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Cum- Commissioner, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Additional Examination Controller And Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Sikar ----Respondents/Applicants For Applicant (s) : Ms. Sara Parveen for Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 25/04/2025 1. Instant civil misc. application has been filed by and on behalf of the respondent-State of Rajasthan through Secretary-cum- Commissioner, Rural Development & Panchayati Raj, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, seeking to recall the final order dated 09.05.2019 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2633/2019 disposing of the writ petition while permitting the writ petitioner to file a representation for documents verification and if she is found to be fulfilling the eligibility criteria then she be appointed on the post of Teacher Grade III, Level I in Zila Parishad, Sikar, if vacancies qua the advertisement in issue is available. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of applicant- State submits that the writ petitioner did not disclose before the Court that she had already availed the opportunity of documents [2025:RJ-JP:17664] (2 of 2) [WMAP-96/2023] verification in the present recruitment process and in the first phase of counseling. Hence, she was not entitled for re-verification of documents. 3. This Court finds that the order dated 09.05.2019 has been passed after extending due opportunity of hearing to the then counsel appearing on behalf of respondents-State and the arguments put-forth by and on behalf of the State has also been narrated in the order. The prayer to submit representation for allowing documents verification of writ petitioner has been permitted in the light of previous judgment dated 12.07.2018 delivered in case of Rohitash Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: SBCWP No.1767/2018. 4. In that view of matter, the present application virtually tantamounts to asking re-hearing of the writ petition on merits which has already been disposed of on merits that too after giving due hearing to the parties. The grounds on which the order has been sought to be recalled, is neither an error apparent on the face of record nor attracts any of the grounds to recall/ review the final order dated 09.05.2019. Merely on account of then fact that the State preferred D.B. Special (Writ) against the final order dated 09.05.2019 and withdraw the same with liberty to file an application for modification/ recalling of order, the scope of review/ recalling of the final order does not become enlarge. 5. As a result, the application is misconceived and same is hereby dismissed. (SUDESH BANSAL),J TN/62