AMAR BUX @ KALLU AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO.
/7036/2025 · 2025-11-24
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176021 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176021 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7036 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned AGA for the State. Whereas, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the informant despite notice.
2. The accused-applicants seek bail in FIR/Case Crime No.97 of 2024 under Sections 308, 323, 324, 325, 504 and 506 of IPC, P.S.- Kamrauli, District- Amethi.
3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that on account of a dispute pertaining to partition, the applicants caused injuries to the victims which resulted in substantial injuries. The injury report do not identify any substantial injury.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances and the dispute arisen out of family dispute coupled with the fact that the applicants are in custody since 01.07.2025 and have no previous criminal antecedent, I am of the view that the applicants are entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicants- Amar Bux @ Kallu and Vindhya Prasad be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to their furnishing separate personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount with the following conditions: (a) The applicants shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ravindra Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Ravindra Shukla Amar Bux @ Kallu And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
(b) The applicants shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
November 24, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 7036 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench