Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17602 (RAJ)

KHEM CHAND DIXIT v. R H B AND ORS

CW/6826/2013 · 2025-03-12

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:11901] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6826/2013 Khem Chand Dixit Sharma, S/o Late Shri Choth Mal Ji Dixit, aged about 61 years, R/o 2-R-19, Talwandi, Kota, Retired Employee of Rajasthan, Hosuing Board ----Petitioner Versus 1. Raj. Housing Board, Jaipur Through Chairman 2. Resident Engineer, Block II, Kota, Raj. Housing Board, Kota ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.L. Songara For Respondent(s) : JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 12/03/2025 1. By way of filing this writ petition, a prayer has been made for issuing a direction to the respondents to release the retiral dues of the petitioner. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner stood retired on 30.06.2012 and retiral dues of the petitioner were withheld unnecessarily by the respondents without any reason till 11.02.2014 and finally these dues were released to him after a delay. Counsel submits that certain dues are still pending which have not been released by the respondents, so liberty be granted to the petitioner to submit a detailed comprehensive representation in the office of the respondents for redressal of his remaining grievance. [2025:RJ-JP:11901] (2 of 2) [CW-6826/2013] 3. The present writ petition stands disposed of by granting the aforesaid liberty. In case, any representation is submitted by the petitioner before the respondents authorities within a period of one month from today, it is expected from the respondents to decide the same, expeditiously as early as possible, preferably within a period of four months thereafter. 4. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. 5. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not issued any direction/order to the respondents to decide the representation in a particular way. The respondents would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/111